By K Raveendran
For all those who prefer order to chaos and method to madness, Donald Trump remains an unending enigma. His entire political career seems to thrive on a disruption strategy that is difficult to anticipate, yet somehow calculated in its unpredictability. In the economic arena, where conventional wisdom has long dictated stability and predictability as virtues, Trump’s penchant for upending global norms has left analysts baffled and many global leaders scrambling. Whether by design or accident, Trump’s actions have continually undermined the pillars of the global economic order, leaving chaos in his wake while promising Americans that this is, in fact, a new order designed to restore their power.
One of Trump’s most dramatic moves came in the form of his unprecedented tariff war, which upended decades of a relatively stable world trade order. His administration’s aggressive policies disrupted global supply chains, enraged long-standing trade partners, and cast uncertainty over multilateral trade deals that had been painstakingly crafted over years. The tariffs imposed on China, the European Union, and even close allies like Canada and Mexico rattled global markets. Even ‘friendly’ India is not spared. Critics argued that the trade war would weaken the United States’ influence in global trade and harm American consumers by raising the cost of imported goods. Trump, however, maintained that the chaos was necessary to renegotiate what he considered unfair trade deals and restore American manufacturing.
After leaving his unmistakable imprint on global trade, Trump’s focus has now shifted toward the internal workings of American financial institutions. One of his latest targets in his quest to exert control over the global economy has been the Federal Reserve, the US central bank. This prestigious institution has historically maintained independence from political influence, a core principle meant to shield monetary policy from short-term political considerations. But Trump, true to form, has challenged that convention with gusto.
His frequent public berating of the Federal Reserve for failing to lower interest rates in line with his demands was just one early sign of his desire to bend the institution to his will. Trump has repeatedly blamed the Fed for hampering economic growth by maintaining what he views as excessively tight monetary policy. While previous presidents have occasionally expressed dissatisfaction with the central bank’s policies, Trump took this to a new level by launching personal attacks on the Fed’s chair and repeatedly seeking to undermine the institution’s credibility.
Now, however, his approach to consolidating financial power appears even more audacious and unconventional. By promoting the use of stablecoins and tokenized US Treasury bills, Trump seems to be embarking on a high-tech strategy to cement the dollar’s dominance in the global financial system—while sidestepping the traditional mechanisms that have long underpinned that dominance. This shift raises profound questions about Trump’s endgame and has evoked widespread suspicion both domestically and internationally.
Stablecoins are digital currencies that are typically pegged to a stable asset, such as the US dollar, to minimize the volatility seen in other cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. By encouraging the use of dollar-backed stablecoins, Trump is effectively weaponizing blockchain technology to extend the dollar’s reach into digital markets. On the surface, this may seem like a forward-looking strategy to adapt to the rapid digitization of the global economy. Yet beneath the surface lies a more controversial agenda: by promoting stablecoins and tokenized treasuries, Trump is challenging the traditional role of central banks, including the Federal Reserve, in managing the money supply and regulating financial markets.
Tokenized US Treasury bills, which represent digital claims on US government debt, take this strategy even further. By tokenizing treasury bills, Trump is effectively forcing investors to buy US debt in a new form that can be traded more easily and quickly than traditional bonds. This move could enhance liquidity in the market for US debt and potentially attract more foreign investors. However, it also raises significant concerns about transparency, accountability, and the potential for financial instability.
Critics argue that tokenizing treasuries could increase the risk of speculative bubbles and financial crises by making it easier for investors to rapidly trade in and out of US debt. Moreover, by shifting financial activity away from traditional banking systems and toward decentralized digital platforms, this strategy could undermine the Federal Reserve’s ability to regulate the financial system and implement monetary policy. In essence, Trump’s embrace of tokenized treasuries represents a bold attempt to reshape the architecture of global finance—while bypassing the traditional gatekeepers.
But why is Trump pursuing this strategy? Some analysts believe it is driven by his desire for control and his deep distrust of established institutions. Trump has never been one to play by the rules or respect institutional boundaries. Throughout his career, he has demonstrated a remarkable ability to exploit loopholes, challenge norms, and push boundaries. His attacks on the Federal Reserve and his embrace of digital currencies can be seen as part of a broader pattern: an effort to consolidate power, disrupt the status quo, and redefine the rules of the game.
Others suggest that Trump’s strategy may be rooted in a genuine belief that the existing financial system is rigged against the United States. By promoting stablecoins and tokenized treasuries, Trump may be seeking to create a parallel financial system that gives the US more control over global capital flows and reduces its dependence on traditional banking networks. This would be consistent with his broader “America First” agenda, which seeks to maximize American power and minimize reliance on multilateral institutions and agreements.
By undermining the Federal Reserve and promoting decentralized digital currencies, however, Trump could inadvertently weaken the very foundations of the US financial system. The Fed’s independence is widely seen as a key pillar of the dollar’s global reserve currency status. If investors lose confidence in the Fed’s ability to manage the US economy and stabilize the dollar, the consequences could be severe. The dollar’s dominance in global trade and finance could be eroded, and the US could face higher borrowing costs and reduced leverage in international negotiations.
Moreover, Trump’s approach could provoke a backlash from other major economies. Many countries are already wary of the US’s dominant position in the global financial system and have been exploring ways to reduce their dependence on the dollar. By aggressively promoting dollar-backed stablecoins and tokenized treasuries, Trump could accelerate these efforts and push other countries toward developing their own digital currencies or alternative financial systems.
For now, one thing is clear: Trump’s approach to economic policy is anything but conventional. Like the wicked villain from another planet in a blood-spilling video game, he seems determined to bend the world to his will, regardless of the consequences. Whether his gambit will ultimately succeed in reshaping the global financial order or lead to greater chaos and instability remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: for all those who prefer order to chaos and method to madness, Trump’s economic policies remain an enigma that defies easy explanation. (IPA Service)
Modi Govt’s Myopic Policy Has Landed Bangladesh Into Lap Of China 