IPA Newspack
  • Home
  • now
  • politics
  • business
  • markets

IPA /

Happening Now

Happening Now

Supreme Court questions right to practice religion at any place

A person has a right to practise religion but the question is whether it can be taken to a school having a prescribed uniform, the Supreme Court observed on Monday while hearing the case pertaining to Hijab ban in Karnataka’s educational institutions.

Hearing arguments on a batch of pleas challenging the Karnataka High Court verdict refusing to lift the ban on hijab in educational institutions of the state, the Supreme Court asked whether a student can wear hijab to a school where a uniform has been prescribed.

“You may have a religious right to practise whatever you want to practise. But can you practise and take that right to a school which has uniform as a part of dress you have to wear? That will be the question,” said a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia.

The Supreme Court posed the question to senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, who was arguing for some of the petitioners.

On the argument that the hijab ban may deny education to women, the bench noted the state is not saying it is denying any right. “What the state is saying is that you come in a uniform which is prescribed for the students….,” it said.

Hegde underlined what the Supreme Court will hold in this case would have a bearing on the education of a large section of society. He also referred to the provisions of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983.

Additional Solicitor General (ASG) K M Nataraj said the issue is very limited and it pertains to discipline in educational institutions.

When the court asked him “how the discipline in a school is violated if a girl child wears hijab?”, the ASG said, “Somebody in the guise of his religious practice or religious right cannot say that I am entitled to do this therefore I want to violate the discipline of the school.”

Advocate General of Karnataka, Prabhuling Navadgi, referred to the state government’s order of February 5, 2022, by which it had banned wearing clothes that disturb equality, integrity, and public order in schools and colleges which some Muslim girls had challenged in the high court.

Navadgi argued it was not the state but educational institutions concerned that prescribed uniforms.

“This government order does not interdict any of the rights of the students,” he said during the arguments which will continue on September 7.

Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, who also appeared in the matter, referred to Article 145 (3) of the Constitution and said it is a matter of considerable importance. The article relates to the minimum number of judges required to decide any substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution.

On whether wearing hijab is an essential practice under Article 25 of the Constitution, the bench said, “The issue can be modulated little bit in a different way. It may be essential, it may not be essential.”

“What we are saying is whether in a government institution you can insist on carrying your religious practice. Because the Preamble says ours is a secular country,” the bench observed.

Dhavan said the issue raised before the court concerns millions of women, who comply with the dress code in educational institutions but also want to wear hijab.

“What this court will rule, the whole world will listen,” he said, adding the Supreme Court’s decision in the matter will be of momentous importance.

During the arguments, the bench observed that if the Karnataka Education Act does not permit prescribing dress code, then the question would be whether the Act prohibits dress code.

“Can the students come in minis, midis, whatever they want,” the bench observed.

Hegde said the executive power of the state cannot be in violation of the fundamental rights.

The Supreme Court had last week issued notice to the Karnataka government on these pleas.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Karnataka, had said a question of law was involved in the matter and no counter may be required to be filed.

Several petitions have been filed in the Supreme Court against the March 15 verdict of the Karnataka High Court holding that wearing of hijab is not a part of the essential religious practice which can be protected under Article 25 of the Constitution.

The high court had dismissed the petitions filed by a section of Muslim students from the Government Pre-University Girls College in Udupi, seeking permission to wear hijab inside the classroom. The prescription of school uniforms is only a reasonable restriction, constitutionally permissible which the students cannot object to, the high court had said.

In one of the pleas filed in the Supreme Court, the petitioner said the high court has “erred in creating a dichotomy of freedom of religion and freedom of conscience wherein the court has inferred that those who follow a religion cannot have the right to conscience.” “The high court has failed to note that the right to wear hijab comes under the ambit of the right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It is submitted that the freedom of conscience forms a part of the right to privacy,” it said.

Challenging the February 5 order of the government, the petitioners had argued before the high court that wearing the Islamic headscarf was an innocent practice of faith and an Essential Religious Practice (ERP) and not a display of religious jingoism.

With inputs from NDTV

IPA Special

Opposition Can Follow A Five-Point Approach To Defeat BJP In 2024 Lok Sabha Polls

June 2, 2023
IPA Special

Bigger Muslim Support To The Congress In Karnataka Poll Is A Positive Signal For 2024

June 2, 2023
IPA Special

Kejriwal Gathering Opposition’s Support Against Centre’s Ordinance

June 2, 2023
IPA Special

Modi Govt Is Planning To Make Sedition Law Stricter Before 2024 Polls

June 2, 2023
IPA Special

‘Deglobalisation’ Talk By Experts Means Tendency Of Western Powers To Discriminate Against China

June 2, 2023
IPA Special

Bengal BJP Revamps Its Campaign Strategy Focusing On Both Left And TMC

June 2, 2023
Happening Now

Law Commission backs sedition law with tougher punishment

June 2, 2023
Politics

Rahul says BJP will be ‘decimated’ in assembly polls

June 2, 2023
Politics

Giriraj Singh calls Rahul Gandhi’s US tour ‘gaali yatra’

June 2, 2023
Politics

Cong to attend Patna meeting of opposition parties

June 2, 2023
Politics

Islam safe and secure in Bharat, vouches RSS chief

June 2, 2023
IPA Special

Installation Of Sengol At New Parliament Building Is A Part Of RSS Plan On Hindu Rashtra

June 1, 2023
IPA Special

Coming Caste Census Has To Focus On Many New Dynamics Of Indian Society

June 1, 2023
IPA Special

High Growth Rate Of GDP In 2022-23 Hides Many Concerns Over Its Nature

June 1, 2023
IPA Special

BJP Leadership At State, Centre Have Been Stoking Manipur Fire

June 1, 2023
IPA Special

Centre and The Ruling Party Have Lost All Propriety By Defending The Accused BJP MP

June 1, 2023
IPA Special

Brazil President Lula Pushes For Integration At South American Summit

June 1, 2023
IPA Special

The Bloody History Behind The British Possession Of The Koh-i-Noor

June 1, 2023
Politics

DMK to coordinate opposition unity efforts: Stalin

June 1, 2023
Politics

Modi blasts Cong for misleading poor, ‘guarantee habit’

June 1, 2023

An appeal

The legacy of IPA, founded by Nikhil Chakravartty, the doyen of journalism in India, to keep the flag of independent media flying high, is facing the threat of extinction due to the effect of the Covid pandemic. Only an emergency funding can avert such an eventuality. We appeal to all those who believe in the freedom of expression to contribute to this noble cause.
Click here to learn more

Share

Reply

  • 0
More on IPA

Law Commission backs sedition law with tougher punishment

June 2, 2023 12:22 pm | IPA Webdesk

The Law Commission has strongly backed the sedition law and has said it should be retained with changes linked to the circumstances of its use....

Happening Now

Gehlot adds free power to pre-poll promises

June 1, 2023 9:00 am | IPA Webdesk

The Congress has tweaked its free electricity promise — which was hugely successful in Karnataka — for Rajasthan, which will have its assembly election by...

Happening Now

Farmers call Khap Mahapanchayat for wrestlers

June 1, 2023 7:11 am | IPA Webdesk

Several wrestlers continue to protest against former Wrestling Federation of India chief Brij Bhushan despite calls from the government to trust the ongoing police probe....

Happening Now

World body condemns action against Indian wrestlers

May 31, 2023 10:00 am | IPA Webdesk

Amid the long-standing protest by ace Indian wrestlers, who have alleged that their complaints against Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh...

Happening Now

Law Commission backs sedition law with tougher punishment

in Happening Now
Jun 2, 2023   ·  

Gehlot adds free power to pre-poll promises

in Happening Now
Jun 1, 2023   ·  

Farmers call Khap Mahapanchayat for wrestlers

in Happening Now
Jun 1, 2023   ·  

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow us on
Up Next: Nitish Kumar in Delhi trying to weave opposition unity
©2020 -2021 India Press Agency, All Rights Reserved.
Newspack by India Press Agency | Statement of Ownership | Contact Us
logo
  • Home
  • now
  • politics
  • business
  • markets