By
Gavin Mendel-Gleason
Two
decades of polling by the Levada Centre, a Russian NGO, show that the majority
of people in Russia regret the downfall of the USSR. It is mainly economic and
social reasons that fuel this regret. This year, positive sentiment towards the
Soviet Union has hit a 14-year-high.
These
statistics are worth spending some time perusing. The popularity of the Soviet
Union ebbs and flows with the strength of the economy. Yet only once since
polling began in 1992 did regret at its demise fall below 50 percent.
What
may come as a surprise to most of us in the West is that the inability to
travel and holiday freely since the collapse is one of the reasons cited by the
public—a stark contrast to the familiar tales of Soviet citizens yearning for
free travel. The relaxation of travel restrictions to countries outside of the
former Soviet states mean little to those who used to spend their holidays in
Sochi, Batumi, or Crimea but can no longer afford to do so.
Somewhat
unexpectedly, I became a personal witness to the disintegration of the USSR. I
saw state services slide into severe chaos as pay packets became meaningless
and people began taking individual action to salvage conditions for their
family, including looting their workplaces.
In
Turkmenistan, where I lived, the situation was so dire that waste management collapsed.
I watched as people began throwing their rubbish out the windows of high rises
in desperation, forcing the evacuation of the ground floor which had become
impossible to occupy as the windows were blocked with decaying refuse. I looked
on in horror as later those same uninhabitable apartments were re-inhabited by
the desperate newly homeless.
People
lost their security, their jobs, their access to reliable sources of
inexpensive food, and many fell into despair. Alcohol consumption increased dramatically,
further exacerbating the social chaos. The number of excess deaths from the
dislocation was estimated to be in the millions.
The
USSR was thoroughly imperfect. Among its flaws were a democratic deficit,
bureaucratic capriciousness, and an insufficiently open intellectual culture.
However, many of these deficiencies persisted with the adoption of capitalism
and a Western-style system. Socialism, however, was destroyed. And to what end?
When
I returned from the former Soviet state of Uzbekistan to the United States, I
couldn’t help but wonder about another path forward. Nothing I had seen
suggested that the economic system had been more dysfunctional under socialism
than in the chaos of privatization, or the decade that followed. Surely they could
have retained economic planning and merely relaxed the intellectual culture?
I
have since come to believe that a significant fraction of the leadership of the
USSR had begun to yearn for the kind of privilege enjoyed by the oligarchs of
the West, with whom they would jealously compare themselves when abroad. Weary
of the continuous threats of attack, and no longer personally invested in the
importance of the project, it appeared to them to come at significant personal
sacrifice. These individuals then collaborated in the destruction of their
state and the welfare of its people.
Our
own Western democracies are sometimes considered mildly flawed but always
fundamentally legitimate. The millions of people killed in foreign wars of
aggression, CIA interventions, and U.S.-supported dictatorships and death
squads since WWII, if mentioned at all, are victims of nothing more than policy
errors. International abductions by the CIA to torture centers—a mishap
committed by callous leaders who can be voted out. The poverty, illiteracy,
lack of healthcare, and declining lifespans of the working class in the U.S.
are a mere aberration.
Content
to sweep our own atrocities under the rug, we are uneasy at the idea of
celebrating the successes of the much-maligned Eastern Bloc states. Any
evidence of superiority is treated as an apology for excesses or deficiencies.
The experience of the majority of people who lived in them is not considered
valid unless it is negative.
Who
knew that more women were involved in science, technology, engineering, and
mathematics, or enjoyed better sex lives under socialism? Let’s take a closer
look at achievements in the areas full employment, housing, universal
healthcare, and education. Let’s remember that they enjoyed an economy without
periodic crises and steady growth over decades, with inequality decreasing
rather than increasing over most years.
If
and when we get another opportunity to build an economy which is not based on
the profit motive, but rather around human need, based on principles of
equality, we should learn from past attempts with some humility. Their
successes were not easy achievements. But we would also do well to think of
ways to protect our successes so we don’t fall prey to such a catastrophe
again. (IPA Service)
Courtesy:
Morning Star
The post Socialism More Popular Now Among Russians appeared first on Newspack by India Press Agency.
