IPA Newspack
  • Home
  • now
  • politics
  • business
  • markets

IPA /

IPA Special

IPA Special

President Joe Biden’s ‘Democracy Summit’ Is Nothing But A Big Hoax

By Ian Goodrum

The two day gala’ Democracy Summit’ convened virtually by United States President Joe Biden on December 8 and 9 is nothing but an exercise in hypocrisy by the leader of the capitalist nations  extending assistance to the worst authoritarian regimes in the world.

The club has an official name, of course; the Summit for Democracy, wherein U.S. President Joe Biden and 110 of his closest friends have a super-secret special meeting in their treehouse to talk about how great they are. But however hard they try to gussy it up, this affair is no different from what Spanky, Alfalfa, and Buckwheat got up to in those Hal Roach short films decades ago.

As per usual, the U.S. government has appointed itself supreme authority—this time of the dictionary. Just like “freedom” and “human rights,” we can count “democracy” as another term that’s lost all meaning after years of being trotted out by the country that cares about it the least. Because aren’t all the best democratic processes the ones where the guy with the most money and guns tells everyone what to do?

That’s only half a joke. Of the 110 supposedly willing participants in this “democracy summit,” many are host to U.S. military bases and troops. Indigenous resistance to U.S. military presence—some might say occupation—is frequently suppressed by comprador governments, who depend on American largesse to fill their coffers. This inconvenient fact, among many others, makes it hard to take this week’s charade seriously.

We might, for instance, ask Salvador Allende of Chile or Patrice Lumumba of the Democratic Republic of the Congo how the U.S. treats elected leaders who dare to espouse an alternate path for their people—if the CIA hadn’t masterminded their assassinations. Even when countries follow the U.S. model, if the results don’t favor U.S. interests those who get elected tend to find themselves staring down the barrel of a gun. Or lately, fleeing their homes as “color revolutions” facilitate the installment of new, more amenable leadership.

Some may complain these examples are old, from the height of the Cold War. But removal of inconvenient leaders, most of them socialists, by the American military-intelligence complex didn’t stop after the Soviet Union ended in 1991—and it’s naïve to believe otherwise. Notably absent from the hallowed list of this week’s “democratic” participants are Bolivia, Venezuela, and Nicaragua. These three Latin American countries have regularly scheduled multiparty elections, but because those elections put left-wing governments into power that oppose U.S. hegemony, they are decried as illegitimate, and their leaders as dictators.

It should come as no surprise these countries’ poor treatment in the press comes with protracted efforts to overthrow their leadership; to cite only two examples, former Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez survived an ouster in 2002 and Bolivia’s Evo Morales was deposed in a fascist coup in 2019 before returning the following year when his party won back the presidency. These anti-democratic moves, just like their Cold War antecedents, were cheered on by the same media that now purports to be defenders of freedom, democracy, and human rights.

So it’s not even about U.S.-style democracy in the abstract. It’s about whether a given “democracy” benefits the U.S. economically and politically. We see this in the summit invitations extended to Israel, a country presiding over a regime of brutal apartheid against Palestinians; Brazil, where judicial shenanigans remove leftist leaders or block their candidacies; and India, where state-supported pogroms on Muslims go unnoticed to ensure participation in U.S.-led military alliances. As with so many things where America is concerned, geopolitical expediency trumps any imaginary commitment to principle.

How popular can the U.S.’ brand of “democracy” be if its existence requires enforcement at gunpoint or, at the very least, the toeing of a particular line? How many countries in the world would, if given the choice, willingly submit to a “rules-based order” that has kept them under colonial and neocolonial domination for decades? Since a global majority names the U.S. as the greatest threat to world peace, the answer isn’t hard to imagine.

But these run-of-the-mill hypocrisies only scratch the surface. There’s a much deeper issue underpinning U.S. “democracy” and all its contradictions, and it’s one Marxists have known about for some time. As Vladimir Lenin said in State and Revolution, “The oppressed are allowed once every few years to decide which particular representatives of the oppressing class shall represent and repress them.” He was paraphrasing Karl Marx and writing over 100 years ago, but those words are as true as they’ve ever been.

Whatever form it takes, under capitalism democracy is little more than a pantomime show. It’s an instrument of class rule, one which provides a vehicle for more efficient exploitation. But all the smoke and mirrors in the world can’t obscure this fundamental fact, and the American people know it on some level—even if they don’t articulate it in those terms.

Is it, after all, a democratic right to live in poverty? To work multiple jobs and barely keep your head above water? To worry over being one of the millions evicted amid a still-raging pandemic?  Is it a democratic choice to decide between risking one’s life at work or one’s livelihood in unemployment or debt peonage?

Nearly 800,000 people in the U.S. have had even those meager “rights” stripped from them, as their democratic government elected to let them die. This is what critics of countries like China don’t understand: You could hold an election every day of the year, but they wouldn’t mean squat if things didn’t improve for the working majority.

This is entirely by design. To quote Lenin again: “Democracy for an insignificant minority, democracy for the rich…that is the democracy of capitalist society. If we look more closely into the machinery of capitalist democracy, we see restrictions [that] exclude and squeeze out the poor from politics, from active participation in democracy.” In the U.S., these restrictions most obviously manifest through voter suppression targeting minority groups, but the political system itself is built on a rotten foundation. It is not a government “of the people, by the people, for the people,” as Abraham Lincoln said in the Gettysburg Address, but one of the capitalists, by the capitalists, for the capitalists. The people don’t enter into it—except as sources of wealth extraction.

China, however, turns this relationship on its head. The Communist Party of China, the country’s leading political organ, is a body with membership from the whole of Chinese society, but its base of support was forged in an alliance of workers and peasants. That alliance continues to predominate, ensuring the working majority remains the primary focus when crafting policy and allocating resources.

In countries like the U.S., the affluent form interest groups to protect and expand their profits; Communists’ only interest group is the people. If action is taken in China or other countries governed by communist parties, social benefits and costs are factored in long before anyone considers what the bourgeoisie will think. Because why should we? They aren’t the majority, and if their ideas were put to a vote they’d lose every time. “More money for us,” sad to say, remains quite unpopular.

There are other aspects of what China terms its “whole-process democracy” that could, and should, be addressed in greater detail. Whole-of-society participation in the political process through oversight, consultation, public review, grassroots governance, and many other avenues make China a far more democratic society than the U.S. and its hangers-on will ever give it credit for. (IPA Service)

Courtesy: People’s World

Happening Now

India slams OIC criticism of Yasin Malik conviction

May 28, 2022
Politics

Regional parties report Rs 250cr electoral bond donations

May 28, 2022
Happening Now

Pak PM says fuel price hike averted bankruptcy

May 28, 2022
Business

No wheat-like export restriction for rice immediately

May 28, 2022
IPA Special

Places Of Religious Worship (Special Provisions) Act Is Still Legally Binding

May 27, 2022
IPA Special

Remembering Jawaharlal Nehru On His 58th Death Anniversary

May 27, 2022
IPA Special

Labour Market Recovery Is Again Under Threat

May 27, 2022
IPA Special

Is Arunachal And Ladakh The Dog’s Life For IAS & IPS?

May 27, 2022
IPA Special

Geetanjali Shree’s ‘Tomb Of Sand’ Wins International Booker Prize

May 27, 2022
IPA Special

Chief Minister Nitish Kumar Calls All-Party Meeting On Caste Census

May 27, 2022
IPA Special

Wage Earners And Bottom 20 Per Cent Are The Hardest Hit By High Inflation

May 27, 2022
IPA Special

Centre’s Sudden Wheat Export Ban Has Hit The Income Of Common Farmers

May 27, 2022
IPA Special

Ray Liotta Of Goodfellas Fame Was An Actor Of Great Talent

May 27, 2022
Politics

BJP wants AAP stopped from becoming main opposition party

May 27, 2022
Happening Now

Imran praises India for fuel price cut, slams Pakistan

May 27, 2022
Happening Now

Putin offers to help solve food crisis if sanctions lifted

May 27, 2022
Politics

Mann govt trains guns on ‘corrupt’ ex-ministers

May 27, 2022
Politics

Expelled Mayawati favourite lands up in Cong

May 27, 2022
Politics

Telangana CM holds talks with Deve Gowda in Bengaluru

May 26, 2022
IPA Special

Indian Membership Of Quad Is Against Both Political And Economic Interests

May 26, 2022

An appeal

The legacy of IPA, founded by Nikhil Chakravartty, the doyen of journalism in India, to keep the flag of independent media flying high, is facing the threat of extinction due to the effect of the Covid pandemic. Only an emergency funding can avert such an eventuality. We appeal to all those who believe in the freedom of expression to contribute to this noble cause.
Click here to learn more

Share

Reply

  • 0
More on IPA

Places Of Religious Worship (Special Provisions) Act Is Still Legally Binding

May 27, 2022 5:28 pm | IPA Staff

By Prakash Karat During the Ramjanmabhoomi agitation, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad and other Hindutva outfits had raised the slogan “Ayodhya sirf ek jhanki hai, Mathura...

IPA Special

Remembering Jawaharlal Nehru On His 58th Death Anniversary

May 27, 2022 5:26 pm | IPA Staff

By Nitya Chakraborty On May 27, 1964 at 1.44 PM, India’s first Prime Minister and one of the best chroniclers of this great nation’s history...

IPA Special

Labour Market Recovery Is Again Under Threat

May 27, 2022 5:23 pm | IPA Staff

By Dr. Gyan Pathak After significant gains during the last quarter of 2021, the number of hours worked globally dropped in the first quarter of...

IPA Special

Is Arunachal And Ladakh The Dog’s Life For IAS & IPS?

May 27, 2022 5:21 pm | IPA Staff

By Sushil Kutty After the newspaper report with the picture showing the IAS couple watching the dog take a walk in the stadium, the Ministry...

IPA Special

Places Of Religious Worship (Special Provisions) Act Is Still Legally Binding

in IPA Special
May 27, 2022   ·  

Remembering Jawaharlal Nehru On His 58th Death Anniversary

in IPA Special
May 27, 2022   ·  

Labour Market Recovery Is Again Under Threat

in IPA Special
May 27, 2022   ·  

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow us on
Up Next: Shiv Sena Bats For Rahul 2024 After Mamata’s ‘No UPA’ Jibe
©2020 -2021 India Press Agency, All Rights Reserved
Newspack by India Press Agency
Posting....
logo
  • Home
  • now
  • politics
  • business
  • markets