IPA Newspack
  • Home
  • now
  • politics
  • business
  • markets

IPA /

IPA Special

IPA Special

ICC’s Arrest Warrant Against Putin Has Little Impact On Russian Actions

By Raushan Tara Jaswal

In what can be termed a historic move, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued an arrest warrant against the Russian President, Vladimir Putin and the Russian Presidential Commissioner for Children’s Rights, Maria Lvova-Belova. This is the first time that an arrest warrant against a head of the State of a permanent member of the United Nations (UN) Security Council has ever been issued, and only the third time that a serving president of a country has been the target of such an arrest warrant. The earlier cases were against Omar al-Bashir (Sudan) and Muammar Gaddafi (Libya).

Staying true to the character it has adopted towards international law since the Russian invasion of Ukraine began last year, the Kremlin has refused to acknowledge the ICC arrest warrant. It terms the warrant as “void” since Russia is not a party to the Rome Statute that established the ICC, and does not submit to the jurisdiction of the ICC. Ukraine, on the other hand, has hailed the warrant as a historic decision for Ukraine.

It is also pertinent to note that the arrest warrant has been issued for the alleged war crimes of unlawful deportation and transfer of population (specifically children) from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation.

Ukraine claims that more than 16,000 children have been illegally deported and transferred to Russia or even Russian-occupied territories in Ukraine. The UN Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine has taken note of this transfer process. While Russia does not refute the claims of transfer of children, it masks them as a “humanitarian campaign to protect orphans and children abandoned in the conflict zone”. Hence, the fact remains that there is a transfer of Ukrainian children across de facto and de jure borders, even though both sides present their own understandings of one of the most heinous alleged war crimes.

The Pre-Trial Chamber II of the ICC has based this warrant against both the individuals on having reasonable ground to believe that they have committed the war crime directly/jointly/through others and even for their failure to exercise control over such people who were under their effective control, considering their superior responsibility. The threshold for command/superior responsibility exists within the Rome Statute for a reason; however, it has been a rarity that a sitting head of State has actually been prosecuted and also convicted of any of the crimes under this principle.

This problem is compounded by Russia’s abject disregard for ICC’s jurisdiction and failure to comply with any of the proceedings that have taken place thus far. It will also be impossible to carry out the arrest against Putin or Lvova-Belova, let alone on Russian soil, seeing the command that they both seem to have within their nation.

So what remains to be evaluated is the repercussions of this arrest warrant, considering the powers of the ICC, and what such warrants have reaped in the past. It also becomes equally important to evaluate the selective jurisdiction exercised by ICC and how it can be used by the Russian Federation as a valid defence. But the most important question that remains to be answered is whether this arrest warrant can be enforced, or it is simply a measure of empty promise, considering the prolonged war.

The case of al-Bashir, against whom the ICC issued an arrest warrant in 2009 and 2010, is instructive. The case remains in the pre-trial stage, and he has still not been prosecuted due to the lack of arrest and subsequent transfer to the ICC at The Hague in Netherlands. He remains “at large”.

The ICC does not try individuals unless they can be present in the courtroom and defend themselves to adhere to basic principles of natural justice — al-Bashir has been in custody since April 2019 (within Sudan). In a recent development, the Sudanese transitional government agreed to hand over the ex-ruler of the country to the ICC. However, as of date, the ICC has not received his custody, and the prosecution remains in abeyance.

In another instance, after the ICC issued an arrest warrant against Gaddafi in 2011, it had to terminate the proceedings due to his death. Multiple concerns have been raised about the circumstances surrounding the death of the ex-Libyan president; however, no serious steps have been taken to investigate the matter.

There have been instances where such proceedings have yielded positive results — such as in the case of former Liberian President Charles Taylor, who was successfully convicted and sentenced to 50 years imprisonment by the ICC in 2012 for his crimes in Sierra Leone’s civil war. Even in the case of Slobodan Milošević, the ex-president of Serbia who was arrested and transferred to the detention unit in The Hague for his alleged crimes in Kosovo. However, before the conviction, he was found dead in his prison cell in 2006.

Both these cases were heard by special tribunals set up in the wake of civil wars, and were specific in their jurisdiction in terms of the crimes committed as well as the territory where the crime took place. This jurisdiction was given by the UN in tacit compliance with the respective governments.

Apart from the Russian Federations’ absolute dismissal of ICC’s jurisdiction — under the Rome Statute (Articles 12–14), other factors also stack up against the enforceability of these arrest warrants against Putin and Lvova-Belova.

Firstly, it has been rare for the ICC to be able to exercise jurisdiction over individuals, especially in the absence of ratification of the Rome Statute (both Ukraine and Russia are not parties to the Rome Statute — while Ukraine has previously invoked its jurisdiction twice). Secondly, since the beginning of its operation, the ICC has only managed to issue ten convictions, none of which have pertained to heads of States or individuals who yield considerable influence in their respective countries. Thirdly, even if arrest warrants have been issued against heads of States, the ICC has never been able to commence prosecution and yield a conviction. Fourthly, an arrest warrant has never been initiated against a head of a permanent member of the Security Council — who holds veto power at the UN and at the Security Council. Fifthly — which is the biggest and most important criticism of the ICC — the proceedings have disproportionately prosecuted crimes in the African continent and have been issued disproportionately against citizens of African nations.

War crimes in the territories of Afghanistan and Syria (both non-signatories to the Rome Statute) obviously highlight the hypocrisy of ICC. There has been a lack of willingness to proceed in these cases. Investigations have been underway for the war crimes and crimes against humanity in Afghanistan; however, nothing conclusive has come out of the investigation yet. The situation is much worse in the case of Syria, where even investigations have not taken place yet.

The ICC’s persistent involvement in Africa has been the source of its criticism, especially with a lack of holistic operation in all nations and any crimes within the scope of its jurisdiction. With 123 signatories, the ICC seems to yield considerable international legal influence, yet it falls short at each stage. This is also due to the fact that many notable countries that command political influence — such as China, Russia, the United States and India — have still refused to sign the Rome Statute, claiming an infringement of their sovereignty by their ability to prosecute its citizens under a separate legal regime.

In fact, the President of the ICC himself stated that the arrest warrants are “not magic wands”, but can provide a “deterrence effect” by acting as a “sanction” against such individuals. Hence, the question begs to be asked at this stage — what is even the point of issuing such an arrest warrant?

Considering the lack of ICC’s own enforcement mechanism, the answer seems to stem from member State cooperation. It depends on member states (123 nations) to fully cooperate with the court — which pertains to their obligation to execute arrest warrants issued by the ICC if the arrestee is found on their soil. After the execution of such arrest warrants, the member States are also obligated to extradite the person(s) to The Hague to await trial.

Apart from providing a personal restriction on Putin’s movement, it seems like this arrest warrant would not actually result in any substantial outcome, especially pertaining to the war in question. Also, it seems highly unlikely that even these 123 nations would proceed, based on this arrest warrant, and detain and extradite the Russian head of State.

Russia’s allies — especially China and India — have not signed the Rome Statute and hence, Putin will be free to travel to these countries apart from the United States as well. At this stage, full-scale prosecution against either of the parties seems highly unlikely. Even if the investigation reveals more crimes committed by either of the parties — the tool of ICC arrest warrant and proceedings overarchingly remains a futile exercise, only to attract international condemnation against the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which has officially surpassed a year.

Considering precedents, it seems impossible to execute this arrest warrant against Putin or Lvova-Belova. It truly seems that this exercise has been a futile attempt to hold them responsible — especially at the cost of resources that could have been directed to similar war crimes elsewhere. (IPA Service)

Courtesy: The Leaflet

IPA Special

Karnataka Election Results Have Given The Congress Some Useful Lessons

May 27, 2023
IPA Special

Forced Labour In India Highest In The World At Present

May 27, 2023
IPA Special

China All Set To Extend Its Solar Dominance To Global Wind Energy Sector

May 27, 2023
IPA Special

Greece Heads For Second National Elections As Coalition Talks Fail

May 27, 2023
IPA Special

Culture Wars Bubble Below The Surface Across Arab Region

May 27, 2023
IPA Special

Remembering Tina Turner, The Unapologetic Queen Of Rock And Roll

May 27, 2023
Politics

Six CMs staying away from PM’s NITI Aayog meeting

May 27, 2023
Politics

Cong poses 9 inconvenient questions to PM Modi

May 27, 2023
Politics

Cooperative federalism turned into joke, Kejriwal to Modi

May 27, 2023
Politics

BJP dares Karnataka govt to ban RSS, Bajrang Dal

May 27, 2023
Politics

Row over ‘The Diary of West Bengal’ film awaiting release

May 27, 2023
IPA Special

Opposition Politics In India Changing Fast In Next Few Months

May 26, 2023
IPA Special

Approval Of MiCA Regulation Leads To A New Dawn For Cryptocurrencies In EU

May 26, 2023
IPA Special

Under Nitish’s Leadership, Joint Opposition Slowly Takes Shape

May 26, 2023
IPA Special

Exchange Rate Depreciation Leads To Lowering Of The Real Wages Rate

May 26, 2023
IPA Special

Sourav Ganguly Has Given A Signal By Accepting Position Of BJP Govt Of Tripura

May 26, 2023
IPA Special

Tina Turner Was The Ultimate Live Performer Who Mesmerised People For Decades

May 26, 2023
IPA Special

Bernie Sanders And Chicago Mayor Johnson Have Come Out In Support Of Biden As Presidential Candidate

May 26, 2023
IPA Special

‘Succession’ Is US Television’s Most Devastating Critique Of The Ultrarich

May 26, 2023
Politics

Cong stand on Delhi ordinance depends on Punjab unit

May 26, 2023

An appeal

The legacy of IPA, founded by Nikhil Chakravartty, the doyen of journalism in India, to keep the flag of independent media flying high, is facing the threat of extinction due to the effect of the Covid pandemic. Only an emergency funding can avert such an eventuality. We appeal to all those who believe in the freedom of expression to contribute to this noble cause.
Click here to learn more

Share

Reply

  • 0
More on IPA

Karnataka Election Results Have Given The Congress Some Useful Lessons

May 27, 2023 3:58 pm | IPA Staff

By Harihar Swarup What are some of the implications of the Congress’s emphasis and creditable win in Karnataka for national politics? At one level it...

IPA Special

Forced Labour In India Highest In The World At Present

May 27, 2023 3:56 pm | IPA Staff

By Dr. Gyan Pathak Forced labour in India is the highest in the world. About 11 million are presently under forced labour in the country,...

IPA Special

China All Set To Extend Its Solar Dominance To Global Wind Energy Sector

May 27, 2023 1:15 pm | IPA Staff

By K Raveendran After establishing complete dominance in global solar supply chain, China is all set to maintain a firm grip of the global wind...

IPA Special

Greece Heads For Second National Elections As Coalition Talks Fail

May 27, 2023 1:09 pm | IPA Staff

By Satyaki Chakraborty Greece is heading for another general elections next month, possibly on June 25 as the ruling National Democracy Party refused to form...

IPA Special

Karnataka Election Results Have Given The Congress Some Useful Lessons

in IPA Special
May 27, 2023   ·  

Forced Labour In India Highest In The World At Present

in IPA Special
May 27, 2023   ·  

China All Set To Extend Its Solar Dominance To Global Wind Energy Sector

in IPA Special
May 27, 2023   ·  

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow us on
Up Next: Mamata Banerjee Starts Corrective Action To Deal With Dissatisfaction Of Minorities
©2020 -2021 India Press Agency, All Rights Reserved.
Newspack by India Press Agency | Statement of Ownership | Contact Us
logo
  • Home
  • now
  • politics
  • business
  • markets