IPA Newspack
  • Home
  • now
  • politics
  • business
  • markets

IPA /

IPA Special

IPA Special

Farm Laws Withdrawal Episode Gives Many Lessons On Pursuing Reforms

By Harihar Swarup

What lesson can we learn from the farm laws episode for navigating reforms in the future? The Prime Minister himself alluded to one big lesson when he admitted in his concession speech that his government failed to disseminate the benefits of the proposed reforms. He was spot on.

Economic reforms produce winners and losers. In the case of farm laws, losers were the relatively large farmers with a marketable surplus, who feared losing the protection of the minimum support price (MSP).

On the other side, potential winners were the larger public who would have benefitted by way of a cleaner environment and lower agricultural prices as market forces gradually engineered a shift in production from cereals to cash crops. The public would have benefitted too, albeit less obviously via the alternate use of the money saved on MSP –better schools and health facilities, for example.

In theory, any reform measure where the winners gain more than the losers lose should sail through. In practice things hardly ever work out that neatly. Many real-world factors – interest group dynamics, biases and even misinformation – come in the way of the best policies getting through Consider for example the unequal incentives of winners and losers to mobilise and agitate for their cause. In the case of farm laws farmers were a relatively small group, united by a single cause, each of them losing heavily if the reform went through.

On the other side, benefits of the reform would have spread thinly across the vast public; for any single individual, the reward was small, the cost of getting organised high, and the incentive to agitate quite low. In the absence of any  effort to mobilise the larger, amorphous group behind its  interest, the smaller group held sway.

The play-off between winners and losers is also complicated by the time dimension. For farmers, he cost if the reform went through would be immediate which therefore galvanised them into action. For the public  on the other side, benefits of reform, although cumulatively .substantial, would accrue over time.

How much weight will the public attach to a benefit that comes not today but later? Overburdened as people are with today’s problems, from their point of view tt is not worth for them to invest time and effort into agitating today for a benefit tomorrow– yet another reason a small interested group gets its way.

Beyond asymmetric incentives to agitate, collective action is also hampered by ignorance. Oftentimes, winners don’t even realise what they might gain by a specific reform. Take procurement under MSP for example. Although the MSP scheme covers 23 crops, the bulk of the expenditure is on buying rice and wheat from a small segment of farmers in relatively prosperous states. Procurement then becomes in effect a silent fiscal transfer from the Centre to those states.

Juxtapose that with the acrimony that surrounds central fiscal transfers to states via the Finance Commission awards and centrally sponsored schemes. Chief Ministers cry foul over their state getting less than its due. Economists have concerns on whether the transfers are efficient and equitable Analysts pore over which states got more or less compared to prior years. And all of them fail to reckon with under the radar transfers such as those under the MSP.

As the Nobel prize winning economist Garybecker argued there are many factors that make small, well-organised groups benefit in the political process at the cost of the vast majority. To promote the larger public good therefore, governments need to invest effort into communication and consultation to prevent the debate getting hijacked by a narrow interest group.

It’s not anyone’s case that the farmers who felt threatened by farm laws would not have come out on the streets if the government explained the case for the reform. But such a proactive effort would have helped in building a constituency for the reform

On the usefulness of prior consultation in navigating contentious reforms, I speak with some personal experience. Back in the mid-1990s, in the Andhra Pradesh government, we the administration was confronted with a serious resource crunch that called for politically painful expenditure restructuring.  The government had to chop many subsidies including raising the price of subsidised rice – the government’s flagship scheme.

Chandrababu Naidu, the CM at the time, agonised over it quite a while and then, instead of deciding ..on the issue right away, suggested that  this be  put off for a white  explaining the financial situation and the government had to make.

Frankly, this was all a waste of time since common people will not understand public finances, and in any case, they will not support a measure that would directly hurt them.  But surprisingly, Naidu, politically savvy as he had always been, organised extensive dissemination of the white paper both through the government .machinery and his party structure.

In several focus group meetings, ordinary people asked if they would get better roads or drinking water in their village from the money saved on the subsidy. After weeks of this, it was not certain there was total support for the subsidy cuts but the opposition to them was substantially attenuated.

We have always taken pride in our reforms being robust because they are vetted by a democratic process. But we should not risk reforms becoming hostage to the distortions of that democratic process.

Jean-Claude Juncker, the former president of the European Union famously said, We all know what to do, we just don’t know how to get re-elected after we’ve done it.”

Narendra Modi, arguably commanding the strongest political capital compared to any Indian leader in decades, has the challenge and opportunity of proving Juncker wrong. (IPA Service)

Happening Now

Muslim body chief condemns Udaipur killing as un-Islamic

June 29, 2022
Happening Now

Owaisi condemns killing, but with a rider

June 29, 2022
Politics

Uddav plays emotional card in bid to win over rebels

June 29, 2022
Politics

Four BJP panels to work out preparations for 2024

June 29, 2022
Business

Crucial GST Council meeting underway

June 29, 2022
IPA Special

Uddhav’s Soft Hindutva Is Being Challenged By Shiv Sena Hardliners

June 28, 2022
IPA Special

100% Electric Two-Wheeler Penetration In India Possible By 2031

June 28, 2022
IPA Special

AltNews Co-Founder’s Arrest By Delhi Police Is A Violation Of All Laws

June 28, 2022
IPA Special

United States Supreme Court Is Using Its Unchecked Power Against People

June 28, 2022
IPA Special

Supreme Court’s Judgment In Gujarat Riots Case Bodes Ill For Democracy

June 28, 2022
IPA Special

Tripura Bypoll Results Showed The Faultlines Of Trinamool Congress

June 28, 2022
IPA Special

Congress In Kerala Loses The Perception Battle

June 28, 2022
Happening Now

Governor may ask for trust vote in Maharashtra tussle

June 28, 2022
Politics

Uddhav was ready to quit, but allies prevailed over him

June 28, 2022
Politics

Simranjit Mann’s win revives broom vs. sword debate

June 28, 2022
Happening Now

Rahul Gandhi blasts Alt News co-founder Zubair’s arrest

June 28, 2022
Happening Now

Fuel shortage forces Lanka to allow only essential services

June 28, 2022
Politics

Victory of Bal Thackeray’s Hindutva, claims Shinde

June 27, 2022
Happening Now

Key Uddhav aide Raut summoned by ED for ‘money laundering’

June 27, 2022
IPA Special

There Is Little To Justify India’s Coal Shortage

June 27, 2022

An appeal

The legacy of IPA, founded by Nikhil Chakravartty, the doyen of journalism in India, to keep the flag of independent media flying high, is facing the threat of extinction due to the effect of the Covid pandemic. Only an emergency funding can avert such an eventuality. We appeal to all those who believe in the freedom of expression to contribute to this noble cause.
Click here to learn more

Share

Reply

  • 0
More on IPA

Uddhav’s Soft Hindutva Is Being Challenged By Shiv Sena Hardliners

June 28, 2022 2:50 pm | IPA Staff

By Kalyani Shankar Is the ongoing Maharashtra political crisis an ideological battle within the Shiv Sena or the inability of  Maharashtra chief minister Uddhav Thackeray...

IPA Special

100% Electric Two-Wheeler Penetration In India Possible By 2031

June 28, 2022 2:47 pm | IPA Staff

By Dr. Gyan Pathak With demand incentives withdrawn after FY 2024, maximum penetration of electric two-wheelers in India could be 71.54 per cent in Technology...

IPA Special

AltNews Co-Founder’s Arrest By Delhi Police Is A Violation Of All Laws

June 28, 2022 2:20 pm | IPA Staff

By Sushil Kutty At last the Delhi Police has gone and done the unpardonable. The capital’s constabulary, which answers to the Union Home Ministry, summoned...

IPA Special

United States Supreme Court Is Using Its Unchecked Power Against People

June 28, 2022 2:17 pm | IPA Staff

By Ben Beckett On Friday, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, ending the constitutional right to abortion and making abortion illegal in at least...

IPA Special

Uddhav’s Soft Hindutva Is Being Challenged By Shiv Sena Hardliners

in IPA Special
Jun 28, 2022   ·  

100% Electric Two-Wheeler Penetration In India Possible By 2031

in IPA Special
Jun 28, 2022   ·  

AltNews Co-Founder’s Arrest By Delhi Police Is A Violation Of All Laws

in IPA Special
Jun 28, 2022   ·  

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow us on
Up Next: Farmer leader Chaduni launches party to contest Punjab polls
©2020 -2021 India Press Agency, All Rights Reserved
Newspack by India Press Agency
Posting....
logo
  • Home
  • now
  • politics
  • business
  • markets