The Lok Sabha now sees a renewed push to loosen the grip of party whips, as senior MP Manish Tewari introduced a private member’s bill aiming to amend the country’s anti-defection framework and grant lawmakers greater freedom in casting votes. The bill would allow MPs and MLAs to vote independently on most bills and motions, reserving disqualification only for votes on confidence motions, money bills and other matters that directly affect government stability.
Tewari, who has previously tabled similar proposals in 2010 and 2021, argued that the present system reduces legislators to “instruments of party commands” and undermines their role as representatives of the electorate. He said the amendment seeks to restore to MPs the ability to vote based on conscience, constituency interests and reasoned judgement — not simply toe a party line.
Under the proposed changes, the text of the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution of India would be modified so that membership loss would only follow if a member votes or abstains contrary to the party’s direction on functional votes tied to the survival of the government — such as money bills or confidence motions. For other legislative business, no penalty would apply.
Tewari’s bill further mandates that any party directive intended to carry binding effect must be publicly announced in the House by the Speaker or Chairman. He has also proposed that an MP who loses membership for defying the whip should have the right to appeal the decision within 15 days, with the appeal resolved within 60 days.
Backers of the amendment see it as a move toward reviving meaningful debate in Parliament, with lawmakers able to engage more deeply with legislation instead of merely casting party-dictated votes. Critics warn that relaxing the whip could destabilise government coalitions and encourage opportunistic voting or defections.
Parliamentary observers note that private member’s bills seldom become law: Tewari himself has twice before failed to secure passage of identical proposals. Yet the Bill comes at a moment when calls for legislative independence and reform of parliamentary practices have gained renewed traction.
Chowdhury questions Banerjee’s silence on Babri row 