The second phase of the Parliament Budget Session commenced today, marked by intense confrontations between opposition parties and the government concerning the alleged imposition of the Hindi language through the National Education Policy . The uproar led Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla to adjourn the house until noon.
Opposition members vociferously accused the government of attempting to enforce Hindi as a mandatory language in educational institutions nationwide, thereby undermining the linguistic diversity of the country. They argued that such a move would marginalize non-Hindi speaking regions and cultures, infringing upon the federal structure of the nation.
In response, government representatives refuted these allegations, asserting that the NEP aims to promote multilingualism and does not impose any language on states or individuals. They emphasized that the policy encourages the learning of multiple languages to enhance cognitive abilities and cultural understanding among students.
The NEP, introduced in 2020, has been a subject of debate since its inception. While it proposes the three-language formula, recommending that students learn three languages in their schooling years, critics argue that the emphasis on Hindi could lead to its dominance over regional languages. This concern has been particularly pronounced in southern states, where languages like Tamil, Telugu, and Kannada hold significant cultural importance.
Today’s parliamentary proceedings witnessed members from various opposition parties uniting in their protest against what they perceive as a covert agenda to prioritize Hindi over other languages. Placards bearing slogans against language imposition were displayed, and chants echoed through the halls, disrupting the scheduled discussions on budgetary allocations.
Speaker Om Birla’s attempts to restore order proved futile amidst the escalating chaos, leading to the adjournment of the session. This incident highlights the deep-seated sensitivities surrounding language policies in India, a nation characterized by its rich tapestry of linguistic diversity.
The government’s stance remains that the NEP is designed to be flexible, allowing states to adapt its recommendations based on their unique linguistic landscapes. However, opposition leaders remain skeptical, demanding explicit assurances that no language will be imposed over others.
As the Budget Session progresses, it is anticipated that debates on this issue will intensify, reflecting the broader discourse on cultural identity and federalism in India. The outcome of these discussions could have lasting implications on the implementation of educational policies and the preservation of the country’s linguistic heritage.
Vanuatu Revokes Lalit Modi’s Passport Amid Extradition Concerns 