IPA Newspack
  • Home
  • now
  • politics
  • business
  • markets

IPA /

IPA Special

IPA Special

Law Minister Rijiju Is Fighting RSS Battle Against Independent Judiciary

By Arun Srivastava

The compulsion to protect the image and personal interest of Prime Minister Narendra Modi is so domineering that his ministerial colleagues can go to the extent of retreating from their avowed ideological line and embrace their sworn enemies.  The Law minister Kiren Rijiju who till a couple of days back left no occasion to decry and debase the Supreme Court, only  on Sunday  eulogized its illustrious status by asserting that Supreme Court was above any organisation.

Rijiju for last six months has been acting like the vanguard of Modi government and RSS to demolish and shred the prestige and image of the Supreme Court made this remark only for the simple reason that that last year it had upheld the clearance given to Modi by a special investigation team in Gujarat riot conspiracy case. Three days back the BBC released a documentary in UK which referred to Modi’s role as chief minister in the Gujarat pogrom of 2002 in which around 2000 Muslims were killed by the  rioters.

Just after release of the clip, Modi government denounced it, but the assertion of the former British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw in an interview with a web portal that the British government conducted an investigation of its own because many citizens of Gujarati Muslim origin were worried about their loved ones in India and “were making representations” to that effect to the then Tony Blair government, put Modi literally in a vulnerable situation and had to block clips of the documentary.

No doubt a big number of people were reluctant to believe the government explanation and even shared the information contained in the documentary. This has in fact enraged Rijiju and he was forced to tweet; “Some people in India have still not moved away from the colonial influence. They consider BBC to be above India’s highest court and pull down the country’s prestige and image to any extent to please their ideological masters ”.Rijiju had to take the  help of clean chit by the apex court to get rid of the BBC documentary allegations.

Quite surprisingly just a day ahead of this development, Rijiju had quoted a retired judge of the Delhi High Court, Justice R S Sodhi saying that the apex court cannot frame laws as it does not have the right to do so. The right to frame laws belongs to Parliament. He even said “only Parliament will amend Constitution. But here I feel the Supreme Court for the first time ‘hijacked’ the Constitution. After ‘hijacking’ they (SC) said that we will appoint (judges) ourselves and the government will have no role in it”.

Before using the statement of Justice Sodhi, the government had also mentioned the observation of the retired former Supreme Court Justice Ruma Pal. She had some reservation about the functioning of Supreme Court. Even on Sunday, the day Rijiju eulogised Supreme Court, he had said “the majority of the  people had ‘sane views’ similar to the one expressed by a retired High Court judge, who said the Supreme Court had ‘hijacked ‘  the Constitution by deciding to appoint judges by itself”.

Rijiju is reluctant to accept the views of the collegium, having at least three judges, but he is too eager to use the statement of the retired judge. Through his tirade against judiciary he has succeeded in giving the impression to the “common people” of the country that he is a well versed person. Naturally one expects that he would agree to the fact that Sodhi is one of the judges amongst thousands of retired judges.  If Rijiju can accept the suggestion of a lone ‘sane’ then why is not willing to agree to the suggestions of other judges. Are they according to him are not ‘sane”?

In the consistent manner Rijiju has been keeping alive the issue of the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court and the high courts makes it explicit that Modi government has its own agenda and it is turn the judiciary dysfunctional and incapacitated.  Only a fortnight back Rijiju has described the collegium system to appoint judges as something “alien” to the Indian Constitution and the Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar has questioned the top court for striking down the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act (NJAC). Both of them talked about the “will of the people” and said it was “undone” by the Supreme Court and “the world does not know of any such instance”.

The way the Modi government has been refusing to approve the names forwarded to it for being appointed as judges either at the Supreme Court or High Courts makes it clear that it intends to enter into confrontation with it just ahead of 2024 Lok Sabha election. Consistent harping on the issue by Rijiju underlines that they are going to make it a big  issue just ahead of the election.

Last week, the Supreme Court collegium had for the second time reiterated the names of two advocates for appointment as judges of the Calcutta High Court “expeditiously”, saying it was not open for the government to repeatedly send back the same proposal. It deserves appreciation for refusing to bow down. The three-member collegium, which makes recommendations for High Court appointments, has reiterated its decision to elevate lawyers Saurabh Kirpal to the Delhi High Court, R. John Sathyan to the Madras High Court and Somasekhar Sundaresan to the Bombay High Court.

Government’s argument has been most ridiculous. While it has objected to one of the candidate’s sexual orientation, about another his political loyalty has been questioned. In fact the collegium has pointed out, neither the sexual orientation of Mr. Kirpal nor the airing of political views by the other advocate will impinge on their suitability or integrity. The other candidate had made some comments on Modi. The Modi government has taken it seriously and does not intend to appoint a person as judge who is opposed to him.

A question is making round the legal circle; what does the law minister’s suggestion mean? Rijiju simply desires for s subservient judiciary too willing to prostrate before the office of the prime minister. But Rijiju ought to not forget that Modi government one day eventually has to bow out of office making space for the new incumbent. The new government may use the subservient judiciary against the BJP leaders who are in power now. It is not that these leaders are pure and pious. Almost all, from top to bottom, have cases against them. In case the new government decided to take revenge, then that backdrop the country will not have an independent judiciary to deliver the right and correct judgement.

Instead of curtailing the rights of the judiciary and forcing it to follow Modi government’s diktat, Rijiju must adopt a democratic and pragmatic approach keeping an eye on the future. He must also keep in mind that saffronisation of the judiciary is only possible in the situation when the nation becomes a Hindu Rashtra, which does not appear to be a possibility in near future. (IPA Service)

Happening Now

Parliament adjourned amid Opposition protest on Adani row

February 6, 2023
Politics

Delhi Assembly fails to elect mayor even on third attempt

February 6, 2023
Politics

Another jolt to Bengal BJP as MLA joins Trinamool

February 6, 2023
Politics

Mann govt faces heat over sacrilege case

February 6, 2023
Politics

AAP to contest all seats in MP assembly elections

February 5, 2023
Politics

New turn in UP’s OBC politics as Maurya backs caste census

February 5, 2023
Happening Now

Video shows Chinese balloon being downed by US missile

February 5, 2023
Politics

Assam CM says child marriage crackdown to continue

February 5, 2023
IPA Special

BJY Has Improved Rahul’s Image To The Congress Supporters But That Is Not Enough

February 4, 2023
IPA Special

China Reopening Changing Market Dynamics Impacting Importers

February 4, 2023
IPA Special

Union Budget 2023-24: Kerala Again Cold Shouldered

February 4, 2023
IPA Special

2023-24 Budget Keeps Key Issues Of Indian Workers Unaddressed

February 4, 2023
IPA Special

Modi Baiter Trinamool Spokesperson Saket Gokhale Is In ED Net

February 4, 2023
IPA Special

Israelis And Palestinians Do What They Do Best, But For Wrong Reasons

February 4, 2023
IPA Special

‘Let It Be Morning,’ A Stunningly Powerful Almost All-Palestinian Israeli Film

February 4, 2023
Happening Now

RBI says banking sector stable amid Adani stocks rout

February 4, 2023
Politics

Cong opposes private member’s bill against worship places law

February 4, 2023
Politics

Cong blasts ‘arm-chair liberals’ for criticising yatra

February 4, 2023
Politics

No plan for remote voting machines, clarifies govt

February 4, 2023
Politics

Chidambaram attacks govt’s anti-minority policy

February 4, 2023

An appeal

The legacy of IPA, founded by Nikhil Chakravartty, the doyen of journalism in India, to keep the flag of independent media flying high, is facing the threat of extinction due to the effect of the Covid pandemic. Only an emergency funding can avert such an eventuality. We appeal to all those who believe in the freedom of expression to contribute to this noble cause.
Click here to learn more

Share

Reply

  • 0
More on IPA

BJY Has Improved Rahul’s Image To The Congress Supporters But That Is Not Enough

February 4, 2023 4:27 pm | IPA Staff

By Harihar Swarup Since his 3,506-km Bharat Jodo Yatra ended on January 30 in Srinagar, it is time to assess its impact. Rahul Gandhi has...

IPA Special

China Reopening Changing Market Dynamics Impacting Importers

February 4, 2023 4:25 pm | IPA Staff

By K Raveendran With China slowly reopening after it abandoned the zero-Covid policy, global markets are bracing up for an industrial inflation, denoting higher industrial...

IPA Special

Union Budget 2023-24: Kerala Again Cold Shouldered

February 4, 2023 4:24 pm | IPA Staff

By P. Sreekumaran THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: It has become a nauseatingly unredeemable tale of rejection and rebuff for Kerala. True to pattern, the State has once again...

IPA Special

2023-24 Budget Keeps Key Issues Of Indian Workers Unaddressed

February 4, 2023 4:23 pm | IPA Staff

By Dr K R Shyam Sundar The Economic Survey (ES) 2022-23 prepared the ground for the focus points in the Union Budget 2023-24 presented on...

IPA Special

BJY Has Improved Rahul’s Image To The Congress Supporters But That Is Not Enough

in IPA Special
Feb 4, 2023   ·  

China Reopening Changing Market Dynamics Impacting Importers

in IPA Special
Feb 4, 2023   ·  

Union Budget 2023-24: Kerala Again Cold Shouldered

in IPA Special
Feb 4, 2023   ·  
Follow us on
Up Next: Tipra Motha’s Rigid Stand On Separate State Halts Alliance Talks With BJP
©2020 -2021 India Press Agency, All Rights Reserved
Newspack by India Press Agency
logo
  • Home
  • now
  • politics
  • business
  • markets