India has initiated a pre-feasibility study for the construction of the Chenab-Ravi-Beas-Sutlej link canal, a strategic water infrastructure project designed to divert significant volumes of water from the Chenab River, which currently flows into Pakistan under the framework of the Indus Waters Treaty . This move marks a pivotal step in India’s efforts to enhance its water security and assert control over the Indus basin resources, as the treaty has effectively become inactive due to longstanding disputes and operational challenges.
The CRBS link canal is proposed to transfer between 15 and 20 million acre-feet of water annually from the Chenab River to the Indian states of Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan. These states, already facing mounting water stress, stand to benefit from increased water availability for irrigation, drinking, and industrial use. The canal is part of a larger government strategy to strengthen domestic water infrastructure and reduce dependence on transboundary water flows governed by contested agreements.
India’s decision to pursue this canal project follows the de facto suspension of the IWT, a treaty brokered by the World Bank in 1960 that governs the distribution of the Indus River and its tributaries between India and Pakistan. While the treaty allows India to use approximately 20% of the basin’s water, ongoing tensions and procedural deadlocks have limited practical water sharing. Islamabad has raised concerns over unilateral actions affecting water flows, while New Delhi has asserted its sovereign rights to develop infrastructure on its rivers to meet domestic demands.
The Chenab River, one of the major western tributaries of the Indus, has historically been a focal point of water disputes. Under the IWT, India is allowed limited use of the Chenab’s waters mainly for non-consumptive purposes such as hydroelectric projects. The proposed link canal would constitute a major diversion, redirecting water eastward towards the Sutlej, Beas, and Ravi rivers — tributaries that flow entirely within Indian territory.
The pre-feasibility study will examine the technical, environmental, and social implications of constructing this extensive canal system. This includes assessing engineering challenges, land acquisition issues, potential displacement impacts, and ecological effects on riverine ecosystems. Government officials involved in water resource management stress the importance of ensuring that the project complies with national and international environmental standards, given the scale of intervention and cross-border sensitivities.
Water experts have highlighted the strategic significance of the project in the context of India’s growing water demand driven by population growth, agricultural intensification, and industrialisation. The northern states targeted by the project have been experiencing dwindling groundwater levels and periodic droughts, underscoring the urgency of augmenting surface water supplies. The link canal is expected to contribute substantially to stabilising irrigation supplies, boosting agricultural productivity, and supporting rural livelihoods.
Analysts caution, however, that the project may further escalate tensions between India and Pakistan, both of which view water as a critical national security issue. The treaty’s suspension has already strained bilateral relations, and major diversions like the CRBS canal could provoke diplomatic and legal challenges. Islamabad has previously expressed concerns that India’s river projects violate the treaty’s provisions and threaten downstream water availability.
Indian officials counter these claims by emphasising that the treaty permits India to utilise its rivers within its territory for agricultural and developmental needs, especially where Pakistan’s objections are viewed as politically motivated rather than grounded in technical treaty violations. They argue that strengthening domestic water infrastructure is essential for sustainable growth and is a sovereign prerogative.
This initiative also aligns with broader water management trends in India, which include ambitious river-linking projects aimed at redistributing water from surplus to deficit basins. Such projects are intended to address regional imbalances in water availability and increase resilience against climate variability. The CRBS link canal is among the most significant river linking proposals, given its potential impact on the Indus basin’s hydrology and geopolitics.
Climate change factors prominently in discussions about the project’s viability and risks. Altered rainfall patterns, glacier melt rates, and seasonal flow variations in the Himalayas complicate water availability projections and infrastructure design. The pre-feasibility study will therefore incorporate climate risk assessments to ensure the canal’s long-term functionality.
In terms of governance, the project reflects evolving approaches to transboundary water management in South Asia, where decades-old treaties are increasingly contested amid changing environmental and political realities. India’s assertive stance on water projects within its territory signals a shift towards prioritising domestic water security over traditional treaty frameworks, a trend mirrored in other river basins worldwide.
The CRBS link canal is also linked to broader regional water security concerns, including the need to address groundwater depletion and water pollution in the affected states. By enabling better utilisation of surface water, the project could reduce pressure on aquifers, which have been severely overexploited in Punjab and Haryana. However, the potential ecological impacts on river health and aquatic biodiversity remain subjects of active debate among scientists and environmentalists.
Economic considerations further underscore the project’s importance. Enhanced water supply could improve agricultural output, supporting key crops such as wheat and rice, which are vital for food security and rural employment. The canal could also facilitate industrial growth and urban water supply, contributing to economic diversification in northern India.
Implementation challenges remain considerable. The scale of the canal system requires significant financial investment, extensive land acquisition, and robust institutional coordination across multiple states and agencies. Political consensus and community engagement will be critical to navigating the complex socio-economic dynamics involved.
Brics Parliamentary Forum Condemns Pahalgam Attack Unitedly 