Chandigarh is set for a closely watched mayoral election as councillors prepare to elect the city’s first citizen through an open show of hands, a procedural change that has reshaped the contest even before the arithmetic of alliances is counted. The vote comes with the Aam Aadmi Party and Congress once again coordinating in the municipal corporation, while the Bharatiya Janata Party seeks to defend its organisational ground in a chamber where margins are tight and scrutiny is intense.
Open voting redraws mayoral contest
The most consequential change is not the alignment of parties but the method of voting. For the first time in the city’s civic history, the mayor will be chosen by a visible show of hands rather than a secret ballot. The reform follows a string of disputes over the conduct of earlier elections, culminating in judicial intervention that faulted procedural lapses and underscored the need for transparency. The open vote is intended to eliminate ambiguity, ensure every councillor’s choice is immediately verifiable, and reduce the scope for manipulation that had dogged prior contests.
The legal backdrop has shaped the present moment. A landmark ruling by the Supreme Court of India earlier this year invalidated the previous mayoral election after finding irregularities in the handling of ballots. The court’s directions went beyond correcting an outcome, setting clear expectations for how the corporation should conduct future votes. The show-of-hands mechanism is the institutional response to that verdict, designed to restore public confidence in municipal governance at a time when civic institutions face heightened scrutiny.
Against this backdrop, the Aam Aadmi Party and Congress have revived their coordination in the 35-member house, a partnership that aims to consolidate anti-BJP votes. Together, the two parties hold a numerical edge when combined, though the margin leaves little room for slippage. The BJP, which has dominated the city’s parliamentary politics, has argued that an open vote merely formalises what should already be transparent, while insisting that discipline within its ranks will hold.
The stakes extend beyond the mayor’s chair. Chandigarh’s mayor presides over council meetings and carries a casting vote in the event of a tie, making the position strategically important in a chamber where motions can hinge on a single hand. The office also symbolises political momentum in a city that often serves as a bellwether for urban governance debates in northern India, from sanitation and housing to transport and fiscal management.
Political actors have adjusted their tactics to the new rules. Whips and internal briefings have taken on greater prominence as parties seek to ensure councillors are present and aligned at the moment of voting. The visibility of the process raises the cost of defection and places individual councillors under the gaze of both party leaderships and the public gallery. Supporters of the reform say this accountability is precisely the point; critics warn it could intensify pressure on councillors and blur the line between transparency and coercion.
The memory of the previous election looms large. The controversy surrounding presiding officer Anil Masih, whose conduct was sharply criticised in court, has become shorthand in the city for what went wrong and why change was unavoidable. Municipal officials now say protocols have been tightened, with clear instructions on quorum, order of proceedings and recording of votes to avoid any repeat of that episode.
For residents, the procedural shift has rekindled interest in a civic election that often struggles for attention amid state and national contests. Civil society groups have welcomed the clarity of the show-of-hands vote, arguing that visible choices align with the spirit of local democracy. Others have urged the corporation to complement the reform with broader transparency measures, including timely publication of agendas, minutes and voting records across all committees.
Court orders shared worship at Dhar shrine 