By K Raveendran
Gold’s surge past the $3,500 mark represents more than just another financial milestone—it is a profound reflection of global market anxieties, geopolitical tremors, and a shifting investment paradigm that places growing scepticism on the stability and credibility of traditional economic hegemonies, particularly that of the United States.
This year alone, gold has rallied an extraordinary 30 percent, a performance that is both historic in its pace and revealing in its implications. Market watchers now eye the $4,000 level as the next benchmark, with Goldman Sachs predicting it could be breached by mid-next year. Other analysts have not ruled out the possibility of gold reaching $5,000 in the not-so-distant future, signalling that what may appear as speculative exuberance is actually rooted in a deep and broad reassessment of risk.
At the core of this gold rally is an erosion of confidence in the U.S. economy and its leadership in the global financial system. This loss of faith is not sudden, but has accelerated dramatically in recent months. The United States, long considered the anchor of financial stability, is increasingly seen as a source of uncertainty. Political volatility, particularly under President Trump’s administration, initiated a series of aggressive economic policies that continue to reverberate. Chief among these was the forced trade war with China—a move intended to secure American economic interests but which has instead triggered a cascade of retaliatory actions, tariffs, and a general souring of bilateral relations between the world’s two largest economies.
The fallout from this trade confrontation has not been limited to tariffs alone. Technology restrictions have intensified, with American firms being barred from supplying key components to Chinese tech giants, and Beijing responding in kind. These actions have effectively split the global tech landscape, complicating supply chains and introducing long-term unpredictability into investment decisions. As capital markets begin to fragment along geopolitical lines, the notion of a seamless global economy—already wounded by the pandemic—is increasingly being replaced by a more fractured, ideologically polarised model. In such an environment, assets that are free from counterparty risk, like gold, become extremely attractive.
Gold’s resurgence, then, is not merely a function of inflation hedging or low interest rates, though both play a role. It is fundamentally a reaction to geopolitical breakdown and a perceived weakening of U.S. economic stewardship. The dollar, once the undisputed safe-haven currency, is now facing competition not just from gold but from a broader reorientation of reserve management by central banks. Countries around the world, especially those with contentious relationships with Washington, are reconsidering their exposure to the dollar. As a result, they are diversifying their reserves, and gold has naturally become a prime beneficiary of this shift. The appeal is simple: gold is no one’s liability. It cannot be sanctioned. It does not rely on the promise or stability of any government. In a world where trust is waning, gold’s ancient allure as a store of value is making a powerful comeback.
This transformation in gold’s market role also reflects a broader philosophical shift. Over the past decade, investors have been groomed to accept the primacy of fiat currencies and central bank control. The Federal Reserve’s interventions during the 2008 crisis and again during the COVID-19 pandemic reaffirmed the dollar’s dominance and the potency of monetary policy. But as government debt balloons, fiscal irresponsibility rises, and political division paralyzes legislative processes, the confidence in the long-term sustainability of such economic models is fading. Investors are beginning to ask: what happens when the debt is no longer serviceable at low rates? What happens when inflation resurfaces, and monetary authorities are constrained in their responses?
In this context, Jefferies’ characterization of gold as “the only true safe-haven asset left” resonates deeply. Bonds, traditionally considered the safe harbour in stormy markets, are no longer immune to the corrosive effects of inflation and policy risk. Equities, particularly in the U.S., appear overvalued by historical standards and increasingly sensitive to policy swings and global tensions. Even real estate, another common store of wealth, is susceptible to local regulatory risk and demographic shifts. Gold, by contrast, is seen as universal, borderless, and timeless. Its value proposition is not tied to the success of a company or the solvency of a government but to its rarity, liquidity, and historical significance as a medium of exchange and wealth preservation.
Furthermore, gold’s current rally is also reflective of changes in investor psychology. The rise of digital platforms and retail investing has democratized access to precious metals markets. Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) backed by gold have surged in popularity, offering a liquid and accessible way for individuals to gain exposure without the need to physically hold the metal. This broader participation is amplifying the momentum behind gold prices, creating a self-reinforcing loop where rising prices attract more buyers, who in turn drive prices higher.
But while investor behaviour plays a role, it is the macroeconomic backdrop that serves as the primary catalyst. The global economic outlook remains uncertain. Growth in China is slowing. Europe is grappling with energy instability and political fragmentation. Emerging markets are struggling with debt burdens exacerbated by a strong dollar and high U.S. interest rates—factors which have traditionally suppressed gold prices but are now less potent as alternative safe havens falter. In fact, the very strength of gold in the face of a relatively high interest rate environment is telling. It suggests that the traditional inverse correlation between rates and gold prices is being overshadowed by a deeper, more structural reassessment of financial risk and monetary credibility. (IPA Service)
India Allowing USA To Raise Its Share In Defence Imports At The Cost Of Russia 