The Supreme Court has issued notices to the Speaker of the Goa Legislative Assembly and eight MLAs who defected from the Congress to the Bharatiya Janata Party in 2022. This action comes in response to a petition filed by former Goa Congress chief Girish Chodankar, challenging the Speaker’s decision and a subsequent High Court ruling that validated the defections.
In September 2022, eight Congress legislators, including former Chief Minister Digambar Kamat and former Leader of Opposition Michael Lobo, switched allegiance to the BJP. This move, referred to as “Operation Kamala,” significantly bolstered the BJP’s strength in the 40-member Goa Assembly. The defectors also included Delilah Lobo, Kedar Naik, Rajesh Faldessai, Sankalp Amonkar, Aleixo Sequeira, and Rudolf Fernandes.
Chodankar’s petition contends that these defections violate the Tenth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, commonly known as the anti-defection law. This law aims to prevent political defections by disqualifying legislators who switch parties. However, the law provides an exception if at least two-thirds of a party’s legislators defect, which the Speaker cited in dismissing disqualification petitions against the eight MLAs.
The Goa Bench of the Bombay High Court upheld the Speaker’s decision, prompting Chodankar to approach the Supreme Court. The apex court’s decision to issue notices indicates its willingness to examine the legal nuances of the case, particularly the application of the anti-defection law in this context.
Political analysts note that such defections have become a recurring phenomenon in Indian politics, often altering the political landscape of states. The term “Operation Kamala” originated in Karnataka in 2008, referring to strategies employed by the BJP to secure a majority by inducing opposition legislators to defect. Similar tactics have been reported in other states, raising questions about the effectiveness of the anti-defection law.
In Goa’s case, the defections had a significant impact on the state’s political dynamics. The Congress, which had won 11 seats in the 2022 Assembly elections, was reduced to just three legislators after the defections. The BJP, on the other hand, increased its tally from 20 to 28 seats, consolidating its position in the Assembly.
The individuals involved in the defection include prominent political figures. Digambar Kamat, who served as Goa’s Chief Minister from 2007 to 2012, has been a significant presence in the state’s politics. Michael Lobo, a former Leader of the Opposition, is known for his influence in North Goa. His wife, Delilah Lobo, also an MLA, was among those who defected. Other defectors, such as Kedar Naik and Rajesh Faldessai, have been active in their respective constituencies, contributing to the state’s legislative processes.
The Supreme Court’s intervention in this matter underscores the judiciary’s role in addressing issues related to political defections and the interpretation of the anti-defection law. Legal experts suggest that the court’s decision could have far-reaching implications for similar cases across the country. The court’s examination will likely focus on whether the defections met the two-thirds requirement and if the Speaker’s decision aligns with constitutional provisions.
This case also brings to light the broader debate on the need for reforms in the anti-defection law. Critics argue that the current provisions are inadequate to deter defections and often lead to political instability. They advocate for stricter laws and more transparent procedures to handle such situations. Proponents of reform also emphasize the importance of empowering voters to hold their representatives accountable for party-switching, suggesting measures like mandatory by-elections in the event of defections.
As the Supreme Court prepares to hear the case, political parties and legislators nationwide are closely monitoring the developments. The outcome could set a precedent for handling future defections and influence the strategies of political parties. For Goa, the court’s decision will not only determine the fate of the eight MLAs but also shape the state’s political future.
In the interim, the BJP continues to maintain its majority in the Goa Assembly, with the defected MLAs holding key positions in the government. The Congress, while diminished in numbers, remains vocal in its opposition, striving to rebuild its base in the state. The court’s forthcoming deliberations are anticipated to provide clarity on the constitutional interpretations of the anti-defection law and its application in this case.
The political scenario in Goa serves as a microcosm of a larger national issue, reflecting the challenges inherent in maintaining party discipline and the sanctity of the electoral mandate. As the judiciary steps in to interpret the law, the balance between legal provisions and political maneuvers comes under scrutiny, highlighting the complexities of democratic governance in India.
New SEBI Chief Prioritises Incremental Reforms 