The Public Accounts Committee headed by Congress leader K C Venugopal is expected to summon the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for further inquiry amid growing concerns over transparency and regulatory practices in the country’s financial markets. The anticipated summons comes as the Finance Ministry prepares to submit an exhaustive report to the committee detailing the regulatory body’s actions and financial oversight, particularly in connection with its management of listed companies and its handling of corporate governance issues.
SEBI has found itself under scrutiny after a series of high-profile corporate mismanagement cases surfaced, leading to questions about the effectiveness of its oversight. The PAC, which has been closely monitoring these developments, is keen to understand the measures SEBI has taken to ensure accountability and prevent further misconduct in India’s capital markets.
The Public Accounts Committee has voiced its concerns regarding the transparency of SEBI’s operations and the frequency of non-compliance cases that continue to emerge from companies listed on Indian stock exchanges. There is growing sentiment among committee members that the regulatory authority must provide a comprehensive account of its activities and measures implemented to curb financial misdeeds. This step is seen as part of broader efforts to bolster investor confidence in the country’s financial ecosystem.
The regulatory body has long been entrusted with the task of ensuring that the interests of investors are protected while promoting the development of capital markets. However, several high-profile corporate governance failures in the country have led to significant losses for shareholders, prompting criticism of SEBI’s role in upholding fair practices. Some financial analysts argue that SEBI has not been assertive enough in curbing violations of corporate governance norms, particularly regarding disclosures and auditing standards.
Key figures within the financial industry have urged for a re-evaluation of SEBI’s enforcement mechanisms, citing that many regulatory breaches have gone unchecked for long periods. These breaches, including non-compliance with disclosure norms and inadequate risk management frameworks, have called into question the efficiency of SEBI’s monitoring systems. Several PAC members are reportedly pushing for a deeper inquiry into SEBI’s handling of these cases to identify the gaps in its enforcement procedures.
It is widely speculated that SEBI will be summoned for questioning during the next round of PAC meetings. While no official date has been confirmed, sources familiar with the matter indicate that the session could take place soon, with SEBI officials expected to answer questions about their regulatory oversight and accountability measures.
The Finance Ministry’s report to the PAC is expected to outline the scope of SEBI’s financial responsibilities, focusing on how its budget is allocated, key initiatives taken over the past few years, and the challenges it faces in enforcing compliance among listed entities. The report is seen as crucial in setting the tone for the parliamentary committee’s subsequent line of questioning and may reveal previously undisclosed details about SEBI’s internal workings.
Corporate governance experts have highlighted the need for greater transparency in how SEBI handles regulatory breaches and enforces compliance. There has been mounting pressure on SEBI to increase its transparency, particularly when it comes to investigations of market manipulation and insider trading. While SEBI has taken significant steps to enhance surveillance of market activities, the persistence of these issues has raised doubts about the overall effectiveness of these measures.
One significant challenge for SEBI has been ensuring that listed companies comply with disclosure norms, particularly regarding related-party transactions and the accuracy of financial statements. In several high-profile cases, companies were found to have concealed critical financial information, misleading shareholders and investors. Critics argue that SEBI’s oversight mechanisms need to be strengthened to detect such irregularities earlier and prevent long-term damage to the capital markets.
As the country’s financial markets evolve, SEBI’s role is becoming increasingly complex, with a growing number of listed companies, new financial products, and an influx of retail investors. This dynamic environment has made the task of regulating the markets more challenging, prompting the need for more robust and agile regulatory frameworks.
Experts have suggested that SEBI needs to adopt a more proactive approach in dealing with market irregularities. This includes not only penalizing companies for non-compliance but also working closely with listed entities to ensure that they follow best practices in corporate governance. The introduction of stricter auditing standards, more rigorous disclosure requirements, and tighter monitoring of market activities are seen as necessary steps to restore investor trust.
SEBI, for its part, has emphasized its commitment to maintaining market integrity and protecting investors. Over the past year, the regulator has implemented a series of reforms aimed at enhancing the efficiency of its operations and strengthening market surveillance. These reforms include the deployment of advanced technologies to monitor trading activities and the introduction of stricter norms for corporate disclosures.
However, market participants remain divided on whether these measures have been effective in curbing financial irregularities. Some have expressed concern that the slow pace of enforcement action has emboldened companies to take risks, knowing that the regulatory repercussions may be delayed or insufficient.
The Finance Ministry, which oversees SEBI’s operations, has maintained that it is working closely with the regulatory body to ensure that its policies align with the broader goals of maintaining a stable and transparent financial market. The Ministry is expected to present its detailed findings on SEBI’s financial health and operational efficiency as part of the upcoming report to the PAC. It is anticipated that this report will play a significant role in shaping the discourse around regulatory reforms in the capital markets.