A 10-hour parliamentary debate in the lower house concluded as MPs broached the 150-year legacy of the national song Vande Mataram today, with voices from across party lines debating its history and symbolism. Among those welcoming the spotlight on the song was Sajal Chattopadhyay — great-grandson of Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay, the composer of “Vande Mataram”. He expressed gratitude to Narendra Modi and the government for initiating the discussion, arguing the song’s creator and his family had long been overlooked.
Chattopadhyay said the parliamentary tribute should have come much earlier, stating, “no one has done anything for my grandfather until now.” He stressed that many parts of the country remain unaware of Bankim Chandra’s legacy, and suggested an institutional recognition — perhaps a university or monument in his name — to preserve memory and educate future generations. He further criticised the state leadership in West Bengal for what he called neglect, urging them to pay their respects properly.
The debate was triggered by the government’s decision to commemorate the sesquicentennial of “Vande Mataram,” first penned in 1875. The initiative is regarded as an attempt to revisit the song’s historic role in India’s freedom movement, and to highlight elements of its original composition often overshadowed in public discourse. Government leaders have argued that certain verses, historically excluded from public performance, carry philosophical and cultural weight — and deserve renewed attention.
This nostalgic reappraisal, however, sparked fresh controversy. Opposition voices argued the focus on the song, with its religious imagery, risks alienating parts of India’s pluralistic society. Some accused the ruling party of instrumentalising cultural heritage for political ends, and charged that the celebration was disproportionately intended to shape historical memory in line with contemporary agendas. Among those critical was Congress, which described the move as an attempt at “rewriting history”, pointing to the song’s selective stanza-use since 1937 as evidence of earlier inclusive compromises.
New Labour Codes Only Enslave Workers, They Should Be Repealed 