By K Raveendran
SEBI would be a nice name for a new range of washing machines. The brand name is short, sweet and has good connect with its namesake market regulator, which has by far excelled in the act of cleaning. Additionally, the new range may not require a detergent, as the machine by itself is good enough to clean any dirt, when required.
The launch could coincide with the meeting of the board of the market regulator under the leadership of Madhabi Puri Buch, which is set to take place on September 30. The meeting could see Buch making a stunning demo of her craft as issues related to charges against her are expected to come up for discussion. Buch’s ‘regulatory’ cleaning involves a revolutionary system that claims to use pure market logic as the cleaning agent, ensuring that all dirt gets washed away in no time. The demonstration is expected to be a masterclass in damage control.
The meeting promises to be far more than a discussion of regulatory matters. After all, Buch herself is facing allegations, and the topic of her conduct—both before and after taking on her leadership role—is high on the agenda. SEBI’s handling of key financial reports, including the controversial Hindenburg report against the Adani group, is expected to be scrutinized. But ultimately, Buch’s ‘cleaning machine’ may be enough to scrub SEBI’s own stains from public memory.
The Hindenburg report marked the beginning of a tough period for SEBI. The report made several claims against Adani Group, accusing it of stock manipulation and accounting fraud. SEBI was thrust into the spotlight, and Buch led the charge in probing the allegations. The initial reaction from the regulator was swift and decisive, launching investigations into the Adani entities that had been named in the report. To the public, it seemed as though SEBI was playing its role as the vigilant watchdog of India’s financial markets.
However, things began to unravel as reports emerged that the investigation wasn’t as thorough as it should have been. Allegations surfaced suggesting that SEBI had, in fact, done more to protect Adani Group than to expose it. The regulator was accused of delaying the inquiry and avoiding the tough questions posed by Hindenburg’s findings. Critics claimed that SEBI’s actions seemed designed to deflect attention away from Adani’s alleged wrongdoing and toward clearing the conglomerate’s name instead.
As SEBI continued to clean up the fallout from the Hindenburg report, murmurs of discontent grew louder. Opposition parties raised questions in parliament, accusing the regulator of not doing enough to hold Adani Group accountable. The allegations against SEBI soon spiralled into a larger controversy, with questions being asked about Buch’s leadership and potential conflicts of interest. There were clear hints that SEBI had deliberately sidestepped its duty to protect small investors by failing to conduct a full investigation.
But SEBI’s controversies didn’t stop with Adani. Madhabi Puri Buch herself came under scrutiny as allegations of corruption within the regulator’s leadership began to surface. Buch was accused of acting in ways that demonstrated clear conflicts of interest, both during her time at SEBI and prior to her appointment as its chief. Opposition parties were quick to pounce, demanding her resignation and calling for an independent investigation into her conduct.
Among the many charges, Buch is said to have manipulated certain cases that came before the regulator to favour certain market players. Her alleged involvement in stalling key investigations into corporate fraud has also been a point of contention. Opposition leaders argue that Buch’s previous corporate ties may have influenced her decisions as SEBI’s head. While the accusations have yet to be proven, they’ve cast a shadow over her leadership at a time when SEBI needs to project an image of impartiality and fairness.
It appears that the ‘washing machine’ metaphor works all too well—though not for the reasons the regulator might want. Instead of cleaning up the financial system, SEBI has spent much of its time scrubbing away its own dirty laundry, attempting to shield powerful players from real scrutiny. The September 30 board meeting is being billed as a pivotal moment, not just for SEBI, but for Buch herself, as the charges against her and the regulator’s handling of the Adani-Hindenburg saga are expected to be a major topic of discussion.
While SEBI has denied the allegations and stood by its chief, the situation raises uncomfortable questions about the integrity of the regulatory body. SEBI, under Buch’s leadership, has taken significant steps to modernize India’s financial markets and introduce reforms, but these achievements are now being overshadowed by the growing list of accusations. (IPA Service)