Chief Justice of India B R Gavai has underscored the joint responsibility of both the Bar and the Bench in addressing the growing backlog of cases in the judicial system. Speaking at the inauguration of the Supreme Court Bar Association lecture series, Justice Gavai focused on the crucial collaboration between legal professionals and judges in streamlining judicial processes.
The CJI’s remarks reflect a critical view of the judicial landscape, where he acknowledged the commendable efforts of some High Court judges but also pointed out the underperformance of others. He expressed concern that while some judges are “truly headstrong” in their commitment to justice, there are others whose performance remains “deeply disappointing”. His comments reflect broader concerns within the judiciary about how inefficiencies and inconsistencies among judges could be contributing to the growing backlog.
Justice Gavai’s comments were made during his address on the topic of ‘Justice for all — legal aid and mediation: The collaborative role of Bar and the Bench’. This theme reflects a growing focus on alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, including legal aid and mediation, to alleviate the burden on courts. These mechanisms have gained traction as potential solutions to speed up the adjudication process and reduce the dependency on traditional litigation, which can be lengthy and costly.
Despite such initiatives, the problem of pendency has only worsened over time. As of the latest data, over 4.6 crore cases remain pending in courts across India, with the Supreme Court itself grappling with a significant backlog. The Chief Justice acknowledged that while the judiciary itself can adopt various reforms, without the active involvement of lawyers in the process, little progress can be made. He called for a concerted effort between the judiciary and legal professionals to resolve the crisis.
An integral part of his address was the role of legal aid. The CJI urged lawyers to be more involved in offering legal aid services, especially to those unable to afford legal representation. Legal aid, as envisioned by the Constitution of India, is crucial for ensuring that justice is accessible to everyone, irrespective of their financial means. However, the practical application of legal aid has remained limited in many parts of the country, with challenges related to funding, awareness, and the quality of legal representation.
In a similar vein, Justice Gavai highlighted the role of mediation as a crucial tool in expediting justice. He pointed out that mediation allows parties to settle disputes without resorting to lengthy trials, thus reducing the strain on the judicial system. Mediation has been shown to not only save time but also provide more satisfactory outcomes for the parties involved, as it encourages cooperative solutions. However, the lack of trained mediators and the reluctance of some parties to accept mediation continues to pose significant challenges.
The Chief Justice also stressed the importance of judges taking a more active role in case management. He pointed out that delays in courts are often exacerbated by the failure of judges to prioritise cases effectively or to ensure that hearings are conducted without unnecessary adjournments. He called on the judiciary to adopt a more proactive approach, ensuring that cases are expedited and justice is delivered in a timely manner.
While speaking about the need for judicial reforms, the CJI also acknowledged the broader challenges that the legal system faces, such as inadequate infrastructure, limited access to justice in rural areas, and a shortage of judges. These systemic issues have compounded the challenges of an already overwhelmed system. Yet, despite these obstacles, Justice Gavai remained optimistic about the potential for reform, urging lawyers to play an active role in pushing for necessary changes.
His address comes at a time when there is growing concern within legal and judicial circles over the need to address judicial inefficiency and reform. Critics have pointed out that the increasing case pendency not only affects the delivery of justice but also undermines public confidence in the judiciary. Given the scale of the backlog, there is a growing consensus that urgent reforms are necessary.
Jaishankar Defends India’s Oil Purchases from Russia 