West Bengal’s Chief Minister has warned that her government will block any attempt to conduct a Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls akin to Bihar’s in the state. She accused the BJP and the Election Commission of targeting Bengali voters in a bid to manipulate the democratic process, and called for organised protest to defend regional identity and democratic rights.
At the Martyrs’ Day rally in Kolkata on 21 July, the Chief Minister accused both the BJP and the Election Commission of conspiring to remove Bengali names from voter lists through a Bihar‑style SIR, asserting that she would “not allow the deletion of a single family’s name”. She said that if even one voter were removed, protests would quickly escalate in scale.
Multiple BJP leaders, including Suvendu Adhikari and Samik Bhattacharya, have supported applying Bihar’s SIR model in West Bengal to clamp down on allegedly fraudulent votes from Rohingya and Bangladeshi migrants. The Chief Minister countered that framing Bengali citizens as illegal migrants constituted “linguistic terrorism” and accused the BJP of waging a cultural offence against the state.
She underscored her objections to recent National Register of Citizens notices sent to residents of Coochbehar by Assam’s Foreigners Tribunal, questioning Assam’s Chief Minister for “meddling” in Bengal’s affairs. Holding up Bengal’s population as victims of discrimination, she said Bengali-speaking migrants are being “harassed and put in detention camps” in BJP‑ruled states.
The rally marked a sharpening of the Trinamool Congress’s electoral strategy, merging regional pride with democratic resistance. The Chief Minister pledged a new “Bhasha Andolan” or language movement starting on 27 July to defend Bengali identity against what she described as external threats. Party general‑secretary Abhishek Banerjee announced that all Trinamool MPs “may speak only in Bengali” in Parliament, insisting the party would not yield to outside influence.
The Trinamool leadership also framed the issue as one of democratic survival. The rally invoked the memory of the 1993 Martyrs’ Day, when 13 Youth Congress workers died protesting voter‑ID irregularities. The Chief Minister emphasised that photo‑ID for voting emerged from that struggle and vowed to continue that fight until the BJP was removed from power at the Centre.
The BJP has defended SIR nationally as a tool to clean up electoral rolls of illegal migrants, citing the unveiling of 94.7% coverage in Bihar and suggesting the move would enhance democracy. A BJP spokesperson pointed out that free and fair implementation of SIR could strengthen democratic outcomes in West Bengal.
However, the Chief Minister dismissed these arguments, accusing the BJP of undermining democratic integrity under the guise of cleansing. She said the imposition of SIR in her state would amount to “Super Emergency” and equated it with central authoritarian measures. She charged the Election Commission with bypassing legal protocols to favour BJP agendas.
Beyond electoral rolls, the Chief Minister broadened the political narrative to include wider concerns. She accused the BJP of cultural interference, citing efforts to curb Bengali language use, dietary freedoms, and religious practices such as Durga Puja. She challenged the BJP to sustain a fish‑and‑meat‑free agenda in Bengal, warning of cultural resistance. She claimed the BJP shifts between religious slogans—“Jai Shri Ram” to “Joy Maa Durga”—based on expediency, and urged Bengalis to remain vigilant.
The ruling party’s general‑secretary echoed that the BJP was adapting slogans to “Joy Bangla” only in response to Trinamool’s resilience, pledging to reclaim cultural pride across all spheres. He accused the BJP of starving Bengal by withholding central funds, downplaying Durga Puja, and imposing electoral disenfranchisement.
Security and administrative preparations reflected the magnitude of the rally, with Kolkata Police briefing senior officials, setting up helplines, and issuing crowd‑control guidelines following a Calcutta High Court directive. The timing of the event, ahead of the 2026 assembly polls, underscores its role as a strategic political launchpad and arena for opposition to national policy.
Supreme Court Warns ED Against Summoning Lawyers for Advice 